in SEO Basics by Jeffrey_Smith

We were contacted by a company touting a top level domain from the 90’s, the kind of domain name you can only dream about acquiring for less than $50K-70K in modern times, however, despite their top 3 ranking for a prominent keyword, they still needed SEO.
ignore the long tail at your own risk
Ironically, they have a mail order e-commerce model that from all indicators is working well for them, so what is the catch? When presented with a plethora of keywords (since they already rank in the top 3 results in Google for their primary keyword) they essentially scoffed with unjust due. According to them, anything less than their primary keyword is of little value to them.

This is where things get strange, upon further inquiry, we were able to determine that 84% of their search engine traffic is hinged on that one keyword. Is this a very SAFE business model? Not necessarily, that is, if you ever want to grow beyond the aggregate traffic of being a one hit / keyword wonder or have to tap out if anything ever happened to your primary / trophy keyword.

The impulse to share the tiered ranking strategies one can implement by assessing competitive market intelligence (by looking at your competition, the market/niche) and what possibilities exist for long-tail search engine optimization were the first thing we wanted to elaborate.

Their reaction, the keywords you present are things we are trying NOT to rank for. The message is simple. Sure, you can acquire blockbuster keywords with thousands of visitors attached, but ignore the long-tail at your own risk. By putting your eggs all in one basket, your business model can disappear in one algorithmic hiccup if the relevance model changes.

For those unfamiliar with the long tail of search, the concept is simple. Instead of someone typing in a broad / nebulous keyword like the word shopping and expecting to find exactly what they are looking for, such a keyword may return a definition of whoever optimized their website best for that phrase (but not exactly what you are looking for).

As a result, people add additional words for long tail queries, by doing so, they are providing additional nodes of relevance for search engines to use term frequency to extract a page with the highest probable relevance and authority on the topic / keyword.

The question is, when you know you are looking for something specific, you use modifiers such as make, model, color, size, brand name, etc. By taking these signals (as a business or webmaster) and implementing coherent naming conventions into pages, proper use of titles, strong internal links and creating segments for distinct types of products, categories and modifiers; you can increase traction for all the items in the website.

Just because you rank for the root phrase (based on the domain name) doesn’t mean you can’t dig deeper and look for additional opportunities for keywords of equal stature that have less competition that are related to your theme.

The takeaway here is, finding a series of strong secondary keywords tiered from the original phrase in tandem can exceed not only the dependency on one keyword, but raise ambient traffic levels to immense proportions.

By them essentially ignoring the long tail, they are only interested in one type of psycho-graphic consumer who thinks along that linear trajectory. Sure, there are a large percentage of people still executing one word searches and perhaps even type in .com traffic for a product, but to deliberately snub the opportunity to double, triple or quadruple traffic is utterly acenine.

Most people use two or more words in search engines to find what they are looking for, why? Because one word searches often result in Wikipedia listings and nebulous search results.

My suggestion, take off the blinders, think as a consumer would think and find keywords  they would type in a search engine if they were looking to buy. With the type of authority the website in question has (ranking for a keyword with 30 million competing pages) acquiring a top 3 position for multiple traffic-bearing stemmed keywords would be merely systematic with a stint of SEO. So, for those who insist on keeping it safe with one word trophy rankings I leave you with a few thoughts for consideration.

Since 80% of most websites get the lion share of visitors from long-tail traffic, do the math and ignore the long-tail of search at your own risk. 

Read More Related Posts
SEO and the Cycles of Optimization
With SEO, being faster is not always better. When you are targeting competitive keywords, slow and steady wins the race. Just as what goes up must come down, understanding the ...
READ MORE
PPC Landing Pages or SEO Landing Pages?
If you ever wanted to make SEO landing pages rank like Pay Per Click (PPC) landing pages, then this tutorial is for you. If you understand the implication of this ...
READ MORE
If Content is King, Relevance is Queen!
We’ve all heard that content is king, but what kind of kingdom are you giving your people? The average marketer will run a totalitarianism kingdom, in which all content focuses around ...
READ MORE
3 SEO Tools for On Page and Off Page SEO
When you’re tired of playing childish games like leap-frog in the search results with your competition and are ready to change the subject from recess to biology and literally dissect ...
READ MORE
SEO Tips for Choosing the Best SEO Technique
Is your site-type configured for optimal performance? If not, then how would you know? Before spending thousands of dollars each month on SEO to play catchup with savvy competitors, you ...
READ MORE
SEO Costs – Paying it Forward
It's no secret that the cost of SEO varies from company to company. In fact, the good SEO Experts can deliberately price themselves higher to eliminate the tire kickers and ...
READ MORE
Theme Density – The Ultimate SEO Ranking Factor
Even though theme density is not a well known term in search engine optimization, many will come to know this as SEO evolves. The root of this SEO model is ...
READ MORE
Don't Disrupt Trusted Nodes of Relevance
Disrupting the trust a website has can be catastrophic to SEO. For example, if you have aged legacy content in a website that is indexed, then that page is contributing ...
READ MORE
SEO Tips for Google Caffeine
As of late with the new Google caffeine algorithms making their presence known, it is more important than ever to take these SEO considerations in mind. 1)      Unique Content: Content must ...
READ MORE
Are Quality Raters from Google the End of SEO as We Know it?
Are Quality Raters from Google the End of SEO as We Know it? The idea that a manual review of a website or it’s SEO from a subjective human quality ...
READ MORE
SEO and the Cycles of Optimization
Make SEO Landing Pages That Rank Like PPC
In the Kingdom of Content, Relevance Rules
SEO Tools for On Page & Off Page
SEO Tips for Choosing the Best SEO Technique
SEO Costs – Paying it Forward
Theme Density – The Ultimate SEO Ranking Factor
SEO Tips for Retooling Legacy Content
SEO Tips for Google Caffeine
Google Quality Raters: SEO’s End or New Beginning?

About Jeffrey_Smith

In 2006, Jeffrey Smith founded SEO Design Solutions (An SEO Provider who now develops SEO Software for WordPress).

Jeffrey has actively been involved in internet marketing since 1995 and brings a wealth of collective experiences and marketing strategies to increase rankings, revenue and reach.

12 thoughts on “Ignore the Long Tail at Your Own Risk
  1. Very informative post, that is true long tail keywords should be focused.

  2. Tom Demers says:

    Great post; this is such a great point. In much the same way you wouldn’t want to rely on a single channel for lead generation (if 98 percent of your leads came through PPC or Email marketing, you would be looking for another marketing avenue) you need to think about expanding/diversifying your keyword portfolio to lower risk…we actually just put up a two-part article on the value of expanding your keyword list: http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2009/04/14/why-most-efficient-frontier-may-be-new-one-value-keyword-discovery-keyword

    Anyway great post!

  3. Great point. Stay in the “box” to long and lose touch.
    Look ahead and adjust to what is coming next from Google.
    Have any idea about when Goggle may do the dance again?

    Don’t forget about me please!

  4. Very helpful post.. I learned a lot…

  5. ade says:

    Very interesting post, one of the best I’ve read on long tail keywords. Also very inspiring. Thanks a lot.

  6. don says:

    great post, I will continue to work on my keyword phrasing. Thanks for the kick.

    don
    http://spiritnewsdaily.com

Comments are closed.