in SEO Basics by Jeffrey_Smith

In all seriousness with all humor aside, to say that the Google SERPs (search engine result pages) pale in comparison to their former stature of stability for those who were comfortable at the top of the top 10 for their most prized keywords is an understatement.

Will the Real Google Search Results Please Stand Up!

Will the Real Google Search Results Please Stand Up!

If you are involved in SEO or have watched the search engine result pages religiously for the past 13 years, then you already know that (1) either something is brewing that will keep many on the edge of their seat or (2) something broke and someone (who was in charge of tweaking the algo)  is now looking for a new job.

If I had to speculate, I would allude that the “term weights” in the current index are assigning a sporadic array of relevance thresholds (nearly by the hour) to pages from the 2nd and 3rd page (almost as if to test them of see what happens when the top ranking results are removed) and then for some odd reason dispelling them as quickly as they appeared. Other changes were briefly outlined in this post.

Although only a handful of Googler’s really know what is going on, for the rest of us, we just have to wait and see what settles as the search results calm down and return to some form of consistency.

If you have seen vast fluctuations such as these before (the Google Dance), you could easily assign this characteristic of SERP anomalies to either (1) a deep crawl to reindex the existing sites (much like a 20 point inspection / shakedown) or (2) penalties in the link graph are creating ripples to offset a new integer or new algorithm.

For those who witnessed the major overhaul of the search algorithm with the Florida update, this latest snapshot of the SERPs is too close to home for comfort. Websites that were steadily ranking in the top 10 results for eons have now taken a hiatus to parts unknown and new website/entrants have been given a new opportunity to shine and upstage their vertically challenged opponents.

There is nothing like taking a bow gracefully, but to see such vast disparities in data centers and fluctuations of this magnitude will have the chat rooms and forums full of speculation in an attempt to make sense of the new shift in the relevance model.

In case you are not affected, for the past few weeks Google has been displaying a parody of relevance for a number of root phrases and keywords. While many less significant keywords, nothing has changed. On the contrary a boost in relevance or traffic for secondary keywords should be expected; however for most the trophy phrases were a definition of status and niche domination.

Now with those search results removed or “pending further manual or algorithmic review”, you have two options (1) pull your hair out in an attempt to second guess some of the brightest information retrieval experts on the planet or (2) looks for signs, patterns and methods to stabilize primary root phrases without panicking in despair.

For example, is now showing up in the #6 position for SEO (at least at the time of this post). Keep in mind that this is a phrase that only occurs in 8 instances in their entire website. Perhaps I am missing something here, nothing against their company (hey, we even use their DHTML menu’s as well) but I beg to differ about how relevant a result their website it, since they only have the keyword essentially on one page and sparsely mentioned throughout the rest of their content.

Is that the most relevant result for someone searching for information on the topic of SEO or seeking SEO services? I would hardly think so… Many other long term search results have also been displaced, for how long, we don’t really know.

Sure, there is nothing like a good challenge for SEO’s, but SERP (search engine result page) fluctuations of this magnitude leave many involved in search engine optimization ready to throw in the towel and fold up shop.

While the elite SEO’s either wait things out (before jumping in with both feet) or are armed with tools and tactics in hand in an attempt to reverse engineer the model and apply counter measures; the update / anomaly only appears to be affecting root level phrases at present.

The only thing you can do is (a) look for stability (b) try to assess which factors and metrics still remain relevant (c) remove obstructions or track your recent changes and (d) don’t panic because it could all roll back in the morning as if nothing occurred.

At present, I opt for (d) until more information suggests that this is something more than a relevance test just to see what happens when variables x, y and z are provided with different defaults for ascertaining authority, relevance or which position is most suitable for each pages respective relevance score.

If you ask me, this is just a deep crawl where it appears something broke and they are going back to a previous snapshot to rebuilt the index. This is not uncommon and in most instances is a good thing, although the rapid fluctuations are enough to make anyone question every action proceeding the loss in rankings.

If you must panic, here are some resources you could use to see that (a) its not the first time and (b) Google knows what they are doing.

Despite the fact that from one perspective it seems odd to purge results on such a grand scale, relevance exists at a price, and that price means that from time to time things as we know them could change.

In closing, you may with to read

Search Engine Amnesia, and the Process of Rediscovery ( a previous rant on the topic of the Everflux)…and Cache Relapse: Did Google Rebuild the Index Right Under our Nose? (another example of a deep crawl wreaking havoc on the SERPs).

Sit tight, if all goes well, someone will come up with a cute name for the update and more information will be provided on the topic, or it will just resolve itself…

In most instances, things usually revert back to basics in 72 hours as the link graph and algorithmic term weights work out the kinks in real time. During the interim, try not to shift your site around too much or make abrupt changes as you could make it unrecognizable when the crawlers make their way back through to validate their tests.

Trust plays a large role in SERP stability, so, the last thing you want to do is undergo a facelift of invasive site architecture makeover, if it was just an algorithmic hiccup which is often the case of a new sub routines beta test. 

Read More Related Posts
Keeping SEO Natural
Don't be tempted by quick results in search engines. It is better to keep your technique and SEO approach natural when targeting competitive keywords. One trend I have noticed pertaining ...
Proceed to Checkout – Understanding Search Behavior
Business is all about exposure, value and availability which is the premise of SEO. When the need arises for consumers to find a product or service like your own, it ...
There are two types of people online (1) people looking for something with the intent to purchase or (2) people perusing the web searching for information (entertainment, social or otherwise). The ...
Which is Best? SEO, PPC, Branding, Lead Generation or Advertising
All things have their place and supplementing one in place of the other when is comes to SEO, SEM / PPC, advertising, branding or lead generation is not always the ...
Template Optimization Tips by SEO Design Solutions
This is the follow up post for SEO Tips for Websites Templates part 1. In this post we discuss how to optimize each segment of your web pages to create ...
Clicks, Keywords and Conversion
You hear terms like clicks, keywords and conversions thrown around in SEO (search engine optimization) and SEM (search engine marketing), but what is the bottom line? Impressions matter, but without clear ...
8 Factors for SEO Rankings
The following bullet points are a consolidation of a few of the Top SEO Ranking Factors that authority sites use to dominate search engine results daily. Understanding Internal Link Anchor Text ...
Optimizing Titles and Descriptions for On Page Continuity
Despite our best predictions with SEO, you can never pin-point with accuracy which keywords from a title tag, meta description or combined occurrence of a keyword on a page search ...
In short, Google's love affair with authority sites is based on the premise of reciprocity, relevance and commercial viability. It’s no secret, that Google’s search engine algorithms are stacked in ...
SEO, Advertising, Automation and Ethics
The line of moral turpitude is what precludes one webmaster from embellishing on another persons property for financial gain. There is a fine line between SEO, Parasite SEO, Advertising and ...
Keeping SEO Natural
Proceed to Checkout – Understanding Search Behavior
SEO Keyword Research: Educational vs. Commercial Queries
Which is Best? SEO, PPC, Branding, Lead Generation
SEO Tips for Website Templates Part 2
Clicks, Keywords and Conversions
8 SEO Ranking Factors
Optimizing Meta Titles and Descriptions
Google’s Loves Affair With Authority Sites
The Difference Between SEO, Web 2.0 and Advertising

About Jeffrey_Smith

In 2006, Jeffrey Smith founded SEO Design Solutions (An SEO Provider who now develops SEO Software for WordPress).

Jeffrey has actively been involved in internet marketing since 1995 and brings a wealth of collective experiences and marketing strategies to increase rankings, revenue and reach.

13 thoughts on “Will the Real Google Search Results Please Stand Up?
  1. Ashish Roy says:

    Jeff, you really explained it pretty well. I was having a tough time explaining to my boss. The rankings are really fluctuating wildly. But what I have observed is that hyper competitive industry segments are the ones that seemed to have got affected the most.

    I know this when I compare clients who are in B2B and manufacturing as compared to our own company which is in web design and development. There seems to be a seed set of industries/keywords that google is targeting for testing. Is my assumption right or this is just again the “trust” factor that is coming into play?

  2. You are correct in your assumption, I notice it the most for root keywords but for SEO, it is ridiculous. I seen what I nicknamed the Google SERP Rollup, it was like seeing a rewind of SERPs from the last year rolled into one day.

    Almost like a blast from the past with highlights. I was going to jot down my take on this as I suspect it is the marriage of two indexes as they “work it out”.

    Sort of like the index from the past vs. the present tense contenders and the winners of the shakedown will remain in teh new consolidated trust rank/ new tally of page rank index.

    Ironically, the SERPs are selective (as if some sites have immunity to this shift). However, those that do not, are bouncing like a rubber ball from page to page and spot to spot.

    This is typical, but we need to give it time to settle before jumping to conclusions, “just to be safe”.

  3. I am a SEO specialist and I have been noticing some of these same results. From my research I have a guess that it is related to Google and their local search project.

  4. Hey I’ve noticed this too, and was wondering what the heck was going on!

  5. Dan says:

    I’m no SEO Pro (but I do use one) and I’m freaking out. My most important search term on Google went from a hard-earned #5 to #92 in a flash. No other search terms are effected. The other strange thing is that slowly typing in the term (Boquete) on Google doesn’t even bring up the word in the “suggestion” drop down – even when fully typed. This is also something new, as Boquete, Panama is a very popular retirement search. Go figure.

  6. ercole says:

    Nice article.
    I am also experiencing heavy fluctuations on my keywords for the past few weeks.
    But, I just wonder, will Google begin to loose trust? I mean, one day I see some “questionable” results for searches, a few days later I see more relevant results that disappear again in a few days. This really makes me think that Google does not know what to do and I am loosing a great amount of trust about the quality of the results. Sure, I am pissed, my website is on a roller-coaster, not knowing what the next day will be. We have followed Google guidelines and still I see crappy results popping up, good trusted sites pushed to the 10th page, etc. Again, Google people might try what works best for them, such as AdSense revenue, regardless of the quality of the site, they might be just switching algos off and on all the times. So, Google, sorry but I don’t trust your results anymore.

  7. This change has really effected my search methods. I was blown away of how my efforts have moved up several of my clients to #1 or #2 rankings overnight and how some long term wins dropped immediately.

    It’s going to be a fun new year. lol.

  8. Ya, i think the change by google will effect the search valume. Yes very nice blog to gain some good knowledge.

  9. Thanks for the lovly article and to know about the new tectics of google that will surely effect the search result. Nice & thanks

  10. Martin says:

    A Major offline reindex has been taking place since the 16th December 2010, this has yet to be rolled out, the current live index has had just a fraction of usual updates since this date.

    I expect there to be some massive changes when the rebuilt index is made live.

Comments are closed.