in SEO Consulting by Jeffrey_Smith

Old School vs. Present Tense SEOAn interesting take on SEO was presented to me yesterday from one of our sales agents which made me aware that most SEO companies are still using methods and tactics hailing from a dated algorithm.
Old School SEO vs. Present Tense SEO
Examples such as a monthly maintenance fee (to ensure your rankings won’t slip vs. targeting more related keywords), retooling old pages and the same old methods that worked in 1995 when search engines were younger and less savvy no longer carry the same weight they once had.

Now, with an optimized content management system that can be refined, SEO plug ins and open source code added or developed to do everything from reducing duplicate content, creating relevance through theming and siloing information, sculpt page rank and hundreds of SEO tactics that had to be applied the old fashion way (page by page) are now available as add-ons.

However, there is still that breed of SEO that instead of addressing SEO from the onset (starting fresh and integrating the old pages), they would rather take a clients money, go back to the well, tweak and refine aged content that has been stuck in search engine limbo and attempt to resurrect or transform it into top 10 material.

For those who are stuck in that mindset, toiling over meta tags and keyword tags I have a few words for you, content creation, optimized templates, naming conventions and impeccable site architecture are present tense modalities worth implementing.

Although I agree on some level, there are many things worth salvaging, the fact is that a 10 page website is still a 10 page website, no matter how great those 10 pages are. Search engines reward content, so give them what they want while not losing the focus of your site.

Once upon a time you could keep a site lean and still capture some competitive rankings (by sheer chronology alone). However, to say that search engine algorithms have evolved and that they are simply more picky and demanding on what they “serve up” to end users for consumption is an understatement.

Say for example, you are dealing with a competitive industry, I don’t necessarily see that website outranking a 50 or 100 page site (that was optimized from the onset) that features (a) more useful information and (b) a wider range of potential semantic phrases and keywords for search engine spiders to sink their teeth into.

I have often referred to the the basis of organic / natural search and how it can be likened to harvesting cycles and sowing seeds that must be nurtured over time in order to yield a flourishing search result that continually evolves to takes its place in the top 10 results.

Each SEO strategist has their method, but strategic planning, timing and execution transcend method and are integral to the success of a stable search engine optimization campaign.

Pages founded on inert variables have a tendency to rise to the top then fall flat after the metric is devalued. With every variable in flux, it is imperative to diversify your SEO tactics and constantly remain ahead of the curve (which typically requires a new approach). This is the advantage to the authority site model where interrelated topics overlap and reinforce each other vs. the mini-site model where if you build it, the idea is that they will come.

We know that one of the prime directives of search engines is to provide useful and specific information to end users based on the queries they enter in a search box.

Although the real magic happens behind the scenes as millions of pages are sifted for relevance (after someone initiates a search) the fact remains that topical relevance and the sheer volume of information you have within your site collectively and the extent of information on your individual pages determine where your sites is ranks according to that search.

In short, your site is scanned, assessed and sorted based on key indicators such as domain age, site architecture, internal linking, link weight coming into each page, outbound links leaving a page, where they link to, how relevant and encompassing the content is as well as hundreds of diverse criteria.

Going back to the original premise of trying to retool a site to MAKE it perform, perhaps a more fluid approach is needed to bring SEO into the present tense where a different prescription would be more applicable. That subscription is create content now, for the sake of acquiring the ranking in 30, 60, 90 or 120 days.

We know that fresh content attracts search engines to your pages for reassessment, we also know that you can utilize a reverse funnel technique to bring more expression to specific areas of your website through using tactful linking. Think of it as time released SEO vs. the retool and tweaking days of the past.

The idea here is, you can still provide search engines with what they want (internally) as well as provide external / inbound links simultaneously to expedite the maturation process of authority for your content.

In short, the days of just building links or going back to the well are drawing to a close for high rankings. It is easier to (1) start fresh with an optimized template or blog (2) create an entire sub folder or category of related content (3) provide the appropriate balance of internal and external links and infuse your site with authority which as we know makes pages rise to the top of multiple search results.

Not to say that old school on page SEO does not work, it does, but sometimes going back to the well (with the exception of linking to fresh content from dated pages) is just overkill.

What needs to evolve is the perspective, not always the method. In fact, you could have captured multiple rankings collectively with the same effort and created more relevance and rankings for future tense optimization, than trying to make a square peg fit in a round hole and only address what content you originally had to work with.

Search engines need a reason to come back to your site, they need a reason to grade your content with a higher relevance score than the other thousands or millions of competing pages all vying for your position.

If is up to you to find the appropriate balance of useful information and landing pages that convert to carve out a spot in the algorithm that has your domain etched in the memory of the spiders as the GO TO source for information on your type of product, industry or service.

That is the real function of present tense SEO, to create relevance to boldly stay ahead of the relevance curve to keep up with algorithms as they evolve and drop dated metrics and the pages that are support by them to the back of the line. 

Read More Related Posts
Don't Take Chances with Keywords
Diversifying your keyword portfolio is imperative for any SEO campaign. How many successful business models are vested in one client or only target one type of potential client for their ...
READ MORE
SEO for Dummies
If you’ve made it to this page, you’ve probably done at least some preliminary research on SEO. You might have mastered the concept of link flow or the art of ...
READ MORE
Create Stronger Websites and Rankings
Theoretically, websites do not get stronger by themselves, they need help. While aging a website is a factor for prolonged growth in rankings, today's SEO tip shared below works by ...
READ MORE
Finding the Proper Balance of SEO
Finding the proper SEO ratios for content, links and competing pages is critical for determining where each keyword fits in the hierarchy. This correlation between site architecture, URL, title, internal ...
READ MORE
We Know, It’s Not Just About SEO
Just like a healthy diet, having a balanced array if nutritional variety serves the overall goal (which is to create holistic health for all functions of the body). Much in ...
READ MORE
SEO, Subdomains, Site Architecture and Sitemaps
Today, (with slight hesitation in fear of giving away too much) I am electing to share an effective SEO method which incorporates the use of sitemaps, subdomains and site architecture. ...
READ MORE
Introducing the Ask an SEO Help Section from SEO Design Solutions
A few weeks back we asked for feedback on our writing style, and specifically how we can help our readers, albeit SEO professionals or click-and-brick small business owners, ...
READ MORE
SEO Vs. PPC, Which is Better?
Search engine optimization (SEO) and pay per click marketing differ in many ways. The distinction is primarily in the way that they both measure return on investment and track conversion. ...
READ MORE
Which Keywords Send the Most Traffic?
A seasoned SEO will tell you, it’s not always the keywords you choose that will drive the most visitors and traffic to your website.You have to implement keyword research to ...
READ MORE
What does the word Optimization mean to you? Although personally, we may have differing opinions about what the term infers, knowing exactly what it means to search engines is ...
READ MORE
SEO Keywords: Use Diversity to Avoid Dependency
SEO For Dummies
SEO Tips to Create Stronger Trust & Domain
SEO Ratios for Content, Links and Competing Pages
We Know, It’s Not Just About SEO
SEO, Subdomains, Site Architecture and Sitemaps
New “Ask an SEO” Help Section from SEO
SEO Vs. PPC, Which is Better?
Keyword Research: SEO, Traffic and Conversion
Semantic Optimization of Keywords for Organic SEO

About Jeffrey_Smith

In 2006, Jeffrey Smith founded SEO Design Solutions (An SEO Provider who now develops SEO Software for WordPress).

Jeffrey has actively been involved in internet marketing since 1995 and brings a wealth of collective experiences and marketing strategies to increase rankings, revenue and reach.

6 thoughts on “Is Your Search Engine Optimization Present Tense SEO?
  1. Thanks for keeping us up to date on tactics.

  2. Vlad Adrian says:

    This is most important in seo technics, but is not relevant in Google industry

  3. Good tips for seo method, keep up update.

Comments are closed.