in SEO by Jeffrey_Smith

Are Quality Raters from Google the End of SEO as We Know it? The idea that a manual review of a website or it’s SEO from a subjective human quality rater (working for search engines) can decide which websites to let slide or penalize is a daunting threat for those forced to compete for search engine rankings.

Google Quality Raters

Are Quality Raters from Google the End of SEO as We Know it?

While search engines use sophisticated algorithms to find the most relevant websites, they still are far from perfect and often rely on data harvested or augmented from humans (search quality juries) to refine their extensive ranking variables.

In 2009 Google had over 10,000 outsourced contractors implemented as “quality raters”, using this as a predicate; one can only imagine what the actual number is now and what tasks, questions or potential variables are included in determine which websites “make the grade” or not.

As we have seen from recent Panda update (the nickname for Google’s last update) sometimes, authoritative websites with excellent editorial quality get lumped with the bad less authoritative websites (based on a tweak to the algorithm) and then Google or other search engines suppress or penalize those websites.

Then, to unwind those penalties, search engines send in the quality review / raters to assess whether or not that website exhibits the characteristics of what that search engine considers editorially viable and / or significant to its users.

While the battery of questions that are used to assess websites under manual review are exclusive and proprietary, we know a few from information leaked from Matt Cutts in an interview with Wired magazine such as:

  • Would you feel comfortable giving this website your credit card?
  • Would you be comfortable giving medicine prescribed by this site to your kids?
  • Do you consider this site to be authoritative?
  • How would you assess the design aesthetic of this website?

To think that the outcome of these questions can either rank or tank your business (in addition to data pulled from the black list of domains from Google Chrome) at least for Google is adding another layer to the SEO process.

If the website passes the editorial review, then a potential penalty can be lifted, on the contrary if it does not, then it can be flagged for suppression.

On the flip side, if the role of the quality rater is sent to sweep and objectively grade websites that are being considered for penalties, what if that person is in a bad mood (from numerous potential stress triggers), or what happens if “a search  juror” has a vested interest or personal prejudice about the site or type of website they are grading?

Should someone’s website who is (a) either oblivious to SEO or (b) doing their best to rank in a competitive market have all progress erased and be sent “to the back of the line” with a manual review penalty? While this may be a few questions and answers to a quality rater, on the other side of that site are vested hours and often famility from employees to feed, bills to pay to keep the business going and tons of debt hanging in the balance.

In short, how many people do quality raters “take out” inadvertently as online or brick and mortar businesses are being forced to fold since their one low cost promotional method (their website) is now nowhere to be found.

Years ago, DMOZ had the most noble intentions of sniffing out quality and since it used volunteers to perform the rating, who is to say that there was not a hidden agenda lurking in their midst.

My question is two-fold (1) will search engine juries (a.k.a. quality raters) fall prey to the same potential corruption or power trips of DMOZ editors and (2) what can you do to protect your website from being checked off the list?

The natural Google friendly answer: (1) Never build links, focus on quality content and have your “#@%#$” handed to you from never ranking since others are blatantly bending the rules and (2) “if you build quality content, people will link to you”…which sounds like a paraphrase of the first.

As noble as those intentions are, markets are fiercely competitive, web stores and the like have to compete with dynamically generated behemoths like Amazon and others and on top of the fact that people rarely link to a shopping page puts e commerce at a distinct disadvantage.

While creating great content is a pivotal portion of achieving rankings (and getting past algorithmic or manual review) SEO is far more complex and online promotion is becoming more difficult by the day.

While I fully understand both Google and webmasters, there needs to be some common ground in ensuring quality thrives and sites worthy are rewarded.

In this light, I hope that quality raters can bring a “more human side” to ranking algorithms and be able to look past a few promotional or “required” competitive thresholds (such as building links) to push past the noise to get a website to page one.

Follow the links below for more information on the topic

Read More Related Posts
Business to Business Internet Marketing
Have you ever felt you may have targeted the wrong audience with your advertising and marketing efforts? Chances are your revenue model could increase sales conversion dramatically as a result ...
READ MORE
SEO Costs – Paying it Forward
It's no secret that the cost of SEO varies from company to company. In fact, the good SEO Experts can deliberately price themselves higher to eliminate the tire kickers and ...
READ MORE
The Phases of SEO Part I
According to Wikipedia - A phase is one part or portion in recurring or serial activities or occurrences logically connected within a greater process, often resulting in an output or ...
READ MORE
Ignore the Long Tail at Your Own Risk
We were contacted by a company touting a top level domain from the 90's, the kind of domain name you can only dream about acquiring for less than $50K-70K in ...
READ MORE
Infographic: How Profitable is Google?
Here are a few tantalizing tidbits of trivia for visual types who enjoy contrast and comparison courtesy of BusinessMba.org called Google: Behind the Numbers. Aside from the glaring monetization prowess of ...
READ MORE
Are You Ignoring Other Types of Traffic?
For those involved in internet marketing, the need to be aware that the vast umbrella of relevance and the medium of user engagement is constantly expanding and SERP traffic (search engine ...
READ MORE
Getting Traffic is Not Enough...
Many people who enlist for SEO services are thrilled to see that their traffic numbers are higher than ever before. But then they are quickly puzzled to see that their ...
READ MORE
How to Jump Start a Stalled SEO Campaign!
If you're a practitioner of SEO or are simply searching for SEO services, then you should know that consistency is the secret weapon of choice for overcoming competitors for keywords ...
READ MORE
With SEO, Timing is Everything!
If you have ever wondered how a particular competitor used SEO to distance themselves distinctly in the top 3 positions for a competitive search term. How is it that they ...
READ MORE
Are Search Engines Raising the Bar?
Thinking from the perspective of a computer science engineer, what is the fastest way to combat search engine spam and websites with low quality?, simply de-index them by raising the ...
READ MORE
Business to Business Internet Marketing
SEO Costs – Paying it Forward
The Phases of SEO Part I
Ignore the Long Tail at Your Own Risk
Infographic: How Profitable is Google?
SEO and (SERP) Traffic is Only One Type
I HAVE TRAFFIC… NOW WHAT?
How to Jump Start a Stalled SEO Campaign
With SEO, Timing is Everything!
SEO: Are Search Engines Raising the Bar?

About Jeffrey_Smith

In 2006, Jeffrey Smith founded SEO Design Solutions (An SEO Provider who now develops SEO Software for WordPress).

Jeffrey has actively been involved in internet marketing since 1995 and brings a wealth of collective experiences and marketing strategies to increase rankings, revenue and reach.

3 thoughts on “Google Quality Raters: SEO’s End or New Beginning?
  1. BMW Tuning says:

    It seem like there is a real battle going on. Google versus every other business. It’s a bit like how the criminals often stay one step ahead of the police. I the same way that spammy sites will stay one stay ahead of quality businesses.

  2. Manifo says:

    I would rather say that this battle is between Google and SEO specialists. Poor people have to change their tactics all the time only because of changeable Google. Some new modifications are totally contrary to the prior and make your previous SEO policy useless or even fatal.

  3. andy says:

    you are right jeff. Content is king, but seo specialist will have other ways to break it. Maybe we have to change our priority to submit our site to another search engine, especially to local one. Yes. It’s hard, very hard way, but we must to start it.

Comments are closed.